February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, March 18th, 2006 07:22 pm
I was very pleased to discover that Title Nine has a store in Palo Alto. They don't carry my size (no one within a couple thousand miles carries my size) but they have something close.

I walked out with a 32DDD - yes, three Ds - in something that I am guessing runs small. I also ordered a 32DD for those days when I might want to descend a stairway while carrying something in my hands. You curvy ladies know what I mean, I'm sure.

One advantage of shopping at a sports store: you get an undergarment that does something more than just make lines on your shoulders.

Dear Victoria's Secret,

I will never darken your door again. I'm sure your feeling of relief at that statement is second only to mine.

Sincerely,
Someone crass enough to have an actual chest
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 04:17 pm (UTC)
The one with everything but flying buttresses is the *only* bra I have ever put on that I can run in (and I have tried hundreds)without someone's hands providing extra support. I have two of them, in case one is dirty...

I have many, many bras from Title 9. I love Title 9. I just ordered from there this week...

Sunday, March 19th, 2006 05:14 pm (UTC)
I always used to hang on when I ran, even in a jogbra. I did a lot of Bay to Breakers that way. :-)

It's an exaggeration when they say you "won't bounce at all, not ever" in that bra -- but it's WAY minimized. And this one I'm wearing was just as good in the dressing room test. Yay Title 9!
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 06:52 pm (UTC)
I always used to hang on when I ran, even in a jogbra.

My solution has been to wear TWO sportsbras, one on top of the other. That's the only way I've ever found enough stability to actually JOG. One sportsbra is fine for lighter activity like step-aerobics or soccer. Why does my comfortable jogging pace have to be at the EXACT natural frequency of my breasts? Is there some kind of evolutionary advantage to that? 'Cause I'm not getting it!
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 07:20 pm (UTC)
I've heard of the two-bras solution but never tried it. I sympathize completely with the natural frequency problem! If this is "intelligent design" I want a smarter designer.
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 07:31 pm (UTC)
They used to say that of the frog bra, which did not work for me. But for the one with all the hooks, I can run in it and not be uncomfortable. Prior to that, it required two layers of Spandex under the T-shirt...

I didn't like running while holding on, which is probably a reason I'm not much of a runner...
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 08:49 pm (UTC)
The frog bra didn't work for me either. But that Last Resort is amazing!

I didn't particularly love holding on either, but that just made me more annoyed at the boobage than at the running!
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 11:12 pm (UTC)
I don't have any balance when I'm holding onto 'the girls'. Either not having the arms swinging, or their own rhythm would send me sideways. :)
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 05:33 pm (UTC)
Wait, you have two hands to add support to your bra, in case one is dirty? I'm confident you can find volunteers to assist in case of any shortage.
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 05:37 pm (UTC)
I once had a running buddy who volunteered. The gait coordination required was impressive.
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 05:55 pm (UTC)
This is what the Summer Olympics is missing. Synchronized running!
Sunday, March 19th, 2006 07:17 pm (UTC)
I want to see the bit where the guy pitches his partner downrange and then has to run at an inhuman pace to go catch her. Of course, with this modification, we're back to "only breastless women need apply" -- making it just like every other Olympic sport.