Tuesday, September 27th, 2005 12:17 pm
Gotta give this a few points for sheer passive-aggressiveness. "The Feds didn't move fast enough in Katrina? All right, how about having the Department of Defense and its armed troops automatically in charge from the get-go?"

My laugh isn't a pleasant relaxed chortle. This state of denial ("It'll never pass") takes effort to maintain.
Tuesday, September 27th, 2005 07:32 pm (UTC)
Why stop at disaster recovery? Let's just turn the Army into a great big Federal Department of Public Safety. Let 'em fight forest fires, shovel snow after blizzards, dig out after mudslides, all that stuff. (I write this half in jest, but a lot of countries do use their armies this way.)
Tuesday, September 27th, 2005 10:14 pm (UTC)
Oh. My. Goodness.

Further federalization of government power is disturbing amidst the finger pointing that I've heard about in the last while. Who's going to be the scapegoat if this comes to pass? Who will accept responsibility for direction of the government's resources? I fear no one.

Regrettably, given the tenor of 'things' in the last few, I can't hold much hope for "It'll never pass".

Of course, with more control from the start, they can more effectively administer the salvage and rebuilding contracts.
Tuesday, September 27th, 2005 10:46 pm (UTC)
"using the military in domestic law enforcement is generally a very bad idea" seems to me the understatement of the century.
Wednesday, September 28th, 2005 06:36 am (UTC)
Another step towards totalitarianism, given the current situation.