I clicked every link, unable to take my eyes off it. I note that in many categories, they seem to have picked the biggest "offenders" - there were no eggs in the breakfast category, no cranberries in the fruits, and no green leafies in the vegetables. Still, it's quite a reminder of all the stuff I couldn't think of touching last year.
Wow. Having a frame of reference visualization makes a lot os sense whether you are doing the calorie counting diet thing or just the healthier eating thing. Thanks for the link.
I am very much a bread eater and would love to see how different breads 'stack up' using this method.
I think that, had something like this been available when I was into my more serious dieting era, I might have been able to pay more attention to what I was ingesting. Calories and calorie tables never made much of an impression on me. This might have.
Yes! I would love to see a site that includes starches so simple that they're sugar by the time they hit your esophagus. Those waffles are nowhere near as low-sugar as they look, even without syrup.
"Note: We don't differentiate between different types of sugar - i.e., sucrose, fructose, cane sugar, corn syrup, honey, etc., although there are differences in how these sugars are metabolized. We just used cubes of white sugar as a visual aid. Nutritional information was taken from package labels, manufacturer websites, or the USDA nutrient database. Calorie amounts are based on 4 calories per gram of sugar unless otherwise noted."
That means natural sugars get counted as cubes too.
Yep, it's a generalization. I think it's still useful; there are differences in how they're metabolized, but nothing like (say) the differences between how a sugar and a fat are metabolized. But it's good that they noted that.
I wish they would put the apple juice picture RIGHT NEXT TO the coke picture. It's so STUPID how schools won't let soda in vending machines, but there's the juice -- as though it's better for you. Have a coke and a vitamin C pill; it's not worse! (Vit. C added to the juice anyway, not much naturally there after all that processing). Personally, I don't think sugar is evil, and I eat a fair bit of it; I just get annoyed at people who say that certain sugar-containing things are evil while other just-as-full items are not. I make my cookies with whole wheat flour; they're better for you than many "breakfast foods" and have about as much sugar, but because they're called "cookies" my housemate gets torqued when I feed them to the kids for breakfast.
Oh, that would indeed be good: the apple juice next to an equivalent-volume serving of Coke. Me, I don't think sugar is inherently evil, but I do think lack of awareness is dangerous (at least in a society so laden with both sugar and diabetes). If people know what they're doing, they can make informed choices, such as choosing whole-grain cookies. I'd love to see your cookies next to a pair of Pop-Tarts or a bowl of Froot Loops.
no subject
Am I the only person who eats sugar cubes in restaurants when he's sick of waiting for the real food to arrive and is starving?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think that, had something like this been available when I was into my more serious dieting era, I might have been able to pay more attention to what I was ingesting. Calories and calorie tables never made much of an impression on me. This might have.
no subject
no subject
"Note: We don't differentiate between different types of sugar - i.e., sucrose, fructose, cane sugar, corn syrup, honey, etc., although there are differences in how these sugars are metabolized. We just used cubes of white sugar as a visual aid. Nutritional information was taken from package labels, manufacturer websites, or the USDA nutrient database. Calorie amounts are based on 4 calories per gram of sugar unless otherwise noted."
That means natural sugars get counted as cubes too.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject