My doc said it is totally legal to pull the toppings off a slice of pizza and eat them. When I mentioned the sugar added to pizza sauces, she said "don't worry about" amounts like that. She said the same thing about dark chocolate: if it's over whatever-percentage the handout said (70, I think), I can eat it, whether it's 2g/serving or 12. And I can have "small amounts" of non-recommended foods: a bite or two of ice cream, a small piece carved off a bagel. "It's all about balance" was the way she put it. "Just make sure you have a lot of vegetables too."
This seems to me to be a very silly way to run a diet, but I'm not going to gripe if it gets me pizza toppings and more dark chocolate. This whole thing wasn't my idea anyway. I'm happy to pretend and hand-wave and ignore.
As for experimenting with stuff, I'm going to do a few key things first.
1) Red wine (white is supposedly worse than red, and beer is worse than either)
2) Some hearty serious whole-grain bread, best I can find without immense quantities of white flour *and* without sugar added to it
3) if I pass the alcohol test, FONDUE (held together with starch, but it's *mostly* cheese and white wine, and *most* of the alcohol should have boiled off)
I bet for a good sense of whether these are or are not problems, I'll need to space them out a good bit, possibly repeating once or twice just to make sure I'm not merely having an unusually good or bad day. Or maybe I'll need to have a significant quantity of just one thing to make sure I'd notice a problem. But in a couple of weeks I could imagine knowing whether I can have fondue.
It's quite possible I'll feel fine after any of them. After all, I felt fine before, when a glass of red wine and some heavily buttered popcorn were a perfectly acceptable dinner. I'll send my doc e-mail with the results if I have no problem, and see what she says from there. Ha; there; I promised I'd do that. I know darn well if I didn't think that up *first* I'd be very tempted to just go wild after a few small successes.
This seems to me to be a very silly way to run a diet, but I'm not going to gripe if it gets me pizza toppings and more dark chocolate. This whole thing wasn't my idea anyway. I'm happy to pretend and hand-wave and ignore.
As for experimenting with stuff, I'm going to do a few key things first.
1) Red wine (white is supposedly worse than red, and beer is worse than either)
2) Some hearty serious whole-grain bread, best I can find without immense quantities of white flour *and* without sugar added to it
3) if I pass the alcohol test, FONDUE (held together with starch, but it's *mostly* cheese and white wine, and *most* of the alcohol should have boiled off)
I bet for a good sense of whether these are or are not problems, I'll need to space them out a good bit, possibly repeating once or twice just to make sure I'm not merely having an unusually good or bad day. Or maybe I'll need to have a significant quantity of just one thing to make sure I'd notice a problem. But in a couple of weeks I could imagine knowing whether I can have fondue.
It's quite possible I'll feel fine after any of them. After all, I felt fine before, when a glass of red wine and some heavily buttered popcorn were a perfectly acceptable dinner. I'll send my doc e-mail with the results if I have no problem, and see what she says from there. Ha; there; I promised I'd do that. I know darn well if I didn't think that up *first* I'd be very tempted to just go wild after a few small successes.
no subject
On the other hand, she said this ISN'T a yeast control diet. (Strictly speaking, she's correct; I can have soft cheeses, while yeast control folks can't, and there are other minor things I've noticed.)
On the other other hand, this is a yeast-style reaction I'm looking for.
I think I still don't get it. Perhaps I should have asked more questions, but as it is I ran out of time. *sigh*
no subject
That said, I'm glad there's some leeway in your diet. I hate to think of you going fondue-less. :)
yeast
My impressions of systemic yeast --informal to be sure-- are that it is easy for it to get out of hand and often a long slow battle to get it back under control. I think this translates to: a little bit of "bad response" may be okay and taken in stride, but a moderate amount of "bad response" may have a pricetag that is very long, and can be in another ballpark. Do check with other sources (like doc by email?).... I guess the point being that the pricetag could be LONG (or vary in lenght) as well as unpleasant. This is my impression of the yeast issue -- that people are all over it so that it doesn't "get out of control" because then it is way hard to get things back to normal. As you are watching for reactions, you can see if this has any relevance.... that intensity of "oops" and length of "oops" may *both* vary, and not be in simple/logical/direct proportion.