Maker Faire

[cjsmith]

I saw syren72 but did not see plymouth, and I heard someone (in a car?) call my name as I was heading toward the entrance but did not see who it was. xthread and crasch, I gots no clue. Never saw ya, and I couldn't possibly have heard my cell phone over the din.

Having skipped a year, I see a lot of contrast between this one and the first one. It's gone mainstream. There's cool stuff, don't get me wrong, but man oh MAN find parking before 10am.

I loved the cupcakes. Kids loved my scooter. I was sorely tempted by the marquetry club, but they meet exactly when I work. The hair on the enormous kneeling woman was fabulous, there was a rather spiffy Dance Dance Revolution-like SunSPOT demo, I entirely missed the battleship fight and the diet Coke and Mentos demo, and if I'd been by myself I might have spent way too much time in Swap-O-Rama-Rama. I was quite pleased to see EAA there; it didn't occur to me a couple years ago, but they're some of the world's ultimate makers. I wish I'd been willing to stay late enough to see some of the fire demos, but I have a houseguest coming.

I'm sure I'm forgetting TONS of stuff. It's hard to see everything when you're three and a half feet tall, two and a half feet wide, and can't go sideways or backwards. On the other hand, I'm not in pain, so there's the tradeoff.

Every year I see a few things that make me think "I could do that!" And every year I don't "do that". Am I busy, burned out, or just not much of a maker? I know I used to be more of one. I'm going to guess it's a little of all three.

Comments

[brooksmoses]

Oh, that was syren72 I saw out in the lot. I thought it had to be, but I wasn't sure. We liked the ropes on the hood. Missed seeing you, though; wish I'd had a chance to say hi.

What we were noticing was not mainstreamness, but corporateness. Fewer random individuals who'd built something nifty, more companies. And lots more marketing of things like $30 boxed kits for doing the Mentos and Diet Coke trick (I kid you not) -- they seem to be aiming not so much at the crowd who actually spend 13 years building a better mousetrap, but at the crowd who come see it and say "I'd like to do that" and then buy something that provides the illusion that they'll do it but in actuality sits in the closet unused. (And I say this with many books of that nature and full closets, mind....)

Anyhow, yeah, parking was much better at 7:35am. *wink*

[genuine-snark.livejournal.com]

Yeah, the kits were new-to-me. I thought some of that was a little over the top, though I suppose the money's really going for the nozzle design they use to shape spray (there were several nozzles of different spray heights/patterns included in the kit).

At least they kept that level of salesmanship in one building, basically, along with the "bookstore" and whatnot. It would have been more annoying strewn throughout.

This is the second time I've gone--first time was two years ago, which I think was the first year. Even that year had some degree of corporate presence--Microsoft had a big robotics exhibit, similar to the one this year with Popfly, etc. However, it was definitely more corporate this year.

I did enjoy some of the smaller startup stuff, though. Among other things, I really liked getting to see the Buglabs stuff in person. I've been kicking around using their platform to prototype a gadget, and it was nice to be able to hold it in my hands.

[plymouth.livejournal.com]

I actually like boxed kits. Or rather, I like that they exist. I don't buy them often and usually when I do it's to use some of the parts along with other parts from elsewhere and make something else entirely... But I was actually thinking while wandering around today that it's really neat that there is this whole continuum between "make completely from scratch" and "buy outright" and that one can drop in pretty much anywhere along that continuum and find a project that works for them and fits their skill level.

[cjsmith.livejournal.com]

One great thing about boxed kits is that they often have the volume to support having one critical piece custom-fabricated. Sometimes it's worth it to pick up the kit just for that piece.

[brooksmoses]

Yeah, I agree with that in general. It was mainly that one kit that seemed a bit excessive, even with the presumably custom-fabricated nozzles.

Mostly what I was noticing that in was the books. The table we happened across was full of books that were chock-full of instructions that looked a bit entertaining to read in a flipping-through sort of basis for a minute or two, but were nowhere near detailed enough to actually be of any use. And it seemed like the whole vendor area was full of that sort of thing.

I wasn't too impressed by the copy of Make magazine that we flipped through, either. tiger_spot picked it up because of the cover article on "Hack your plants!" This turned out to be two and a half pages of a very basic intro to grafting, cross-pollination, and something else relatively trivial. It wasn't really enough depth to actually explain the tricks to how to do it in more than an extremely cursory way; if I were actually wanting to do it, I'd want to do rather more research first, at which point the article isn't very helpful. And those sorts of tricks are the things I find interesting to read about, too, so it also failed that test.

[cjsmith.livejournal.com]

Yeah, I figured it was syren72 when I saw the ropes, but was sure when I saw the license plate.

Yes indeed: corporateness. Absolutely. That was big this year.