I have recently faced the idea that there may be people I have met and liked who honestly believe that attacking the innocent and the powerless, especially girls or young women, is a good way to get things done.
I do not know if I am misunderstanding the person in question. It seems likely. I could be taking things too literally, a common failing of mine.* I could be misunderstanding in some other way. But even supposing this one is a misunderstanding, I've now faced the idea, and it's not at all pleasant.
Maybe I was in the Army too long. (I honestly believe the vast majority of US soldiers hold this value as strongly as I do.) You don't DO shit like that. You don't even THINK about THREATENING to do shit like that.
_____________
* If I'm starting to get ticked off, it could be nothing more serious than my belief that what you say is what you mean. A useful tactic might be to remind both of us of this pattern. Humans are neither robots nor computers, and I forget that too often.
I do not know if I am misunderstanding the person in question. It seems likely. I could be taking things too literally, a common failing of mine.* I could be misunderstanding in some other way. But even supposing this one is a misunderstanding, I've now faced the idea, and it's not at all pleasant.
Maybe I was in the Army too long. (I honestly believe the vast majority of US soldiers hold this value as strongly as I do.) You don't DO shit like that. You don't even THINK about THREATENING to do shit like that.
_____________
* If I'm starting to get ticked off, it could be nothing more serious than my belief that what you say is what you mean. A useful tactic might be to remind both of us of this pattern. Humans are neither robots nor computers, and I forget that too often.
WARNING: My knowledge of the military comes mainly from "Asterix the Legionaire"
I think what makes it blurry is that in unconventional war, it's really really hard to tell who the combatants are. So a soldier out in the field is thinking about attacking innocents all the time--because he doesn't know if they're innocent. Smiling ten-year-old Iraqi is running towards the convoy--the soldier has to be asking himself questions like, "Does he have a bomb? How much time will I need to shoot him if he does have a bomb? What's the longest I can take to work that out?" Then the kid stops running and waves, and the soldier thinks "whew, he was an innocent after all" and throws him a Hershey bar.
That's the sort of thing the Geneva conventions were meant to fix. If all the soldiers wear uniforms, then everyone not wearing a uniform is a civilian, and is safe. The soldiers have agreed to wear "shoot me" signs, to protect the non-soldiers. So if one side stops fighting in uniform, they're deliberately hiding behind the civilians.
Sorry... rant over now.
Re: WARNING: My knowledge of the military comes mainly from "Asterix the Legionaire"