February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Sunday, September 10th, 2006 02:45 pm
The Honda hybrids are pricey (used) or hard to find (new); they also have very anemic acceleration.* Heck, currently I hate getting stuck behind a Prius, and those things are downright peppy compared to the 2005 Honda Civic hybrid. [edit: The Prius itself is as peppy as I'd ever want. Their drivers may often choose slow acceleration. I have now been called on this three times from the Prius gallery.] Back to the Civic, though, how much are carpool stickers worth if I can't accelerate enough to merge into traffic sanely? What was I thinking?

I guess it's going to be the regular Civic sedan. It will certainly be reliable and last me a good long time. All I'll have to do to keep that car running is stay away from California drivers! Easy! ...oh, wait.

I put a small "right of first refusal" deposit on one today. It won't come in until the first or second week of October, and as it hasn't been assigned a VIN yet it will probably be a 2007, which I have never seen. As the deposit is both small and refundable, I will be making an effort to find another car sooner.

______________________

*Other hybrid options don't work well at all. The Prius is too big, too expensive, and has too long a wait list, but I admit it would be fun to snag a used one and try for a full-electric conversion.** The Camry and Accord are of course too big. The Insight has no trunk, and I may very well need to haul a scooter some day (not to mention the square dance calling equipment).

**This is particularly nifty given that we have solar panels on the house. If we get rid of the pool and its associated pump, we become a net producer over the year as a whole. Might as well use some of that excess to drive a truly zero-emissions car!
Monday, September 11th, 2006 03:39 am (UTC)
Oh interesting. The two we drove today were whining (sounded like uncomfortably high engine RPM) at about sixty miles an hour. We could get them to 65, but they didn't like it, and we didn't have enough time before our exit to get them to 70. Merging was a little worrisome.

What year is yours? These were 2005. I can imagine year might make a big difference.
Monday, September 11th, 2006 03:43 am (UTC)
OMG that's so not like mine, mine's happiest going 80. I got a ticket because of it. It just naturally likes to cruise at 80 and I have to consciously back it off.

Mine is a 2003, the first year they made them. Whining is NOT a good sign in a car, glad you stayed away. Ick.
Monday, September 11th, 2006 03:50 am (UTC)
Wow! Maybe a 2003 would be better!