February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, August 19th, 2006 09:13 am
As expected, I feel kinda crappy. Neck to hip -- all the sideways stuff went directly to the spine. Glad I'm not flying an airplane. Not too awful though; I've certainly had far worse, and I'm firmly aware that I am very fortunate. I'll be surprised if it's not noticeably improved by tomorrow.

Heading out in a few minutes to drop my car off for an estimate (needed to determine whether it'll be totaled), pick up a rental, and start SHOPPIN'.
Sunday, August 20th, 2006 06:59 pm (UTC)
it's well under $50k How long do you keep a car, about 10 years, right? So, really, it's not that bad at all!
Sunday, August 20th, 2006 07:10 pm (UTC)
I kept this last one seventeen years and it cost me just a tad under $10K. I guess I'm frugal :-)
Sunday, August 20th, 2006 07:24 pm (UTC)
Even better.. in 17 years, I spend more money on venti skim hot cocoas in Starbucks than I would on a Lotus ;-)

Actually, in cars, I tend to be practical as well. Sure, I *could* spend the money and get a BMW M5, but the idea of spending 80K on an automobile is insane. The best kind of car is the one that's paid for (and has good MPG).
Monday, August 21st, 2006 12:15 am (UTC)
Mmm. The venti skim hot cocoas taste much better. ;-)

I hear ya on the practicality. It'd be nice to have, say, a BMW 3-series convertible, but it wouldn't be forty thousand dollars' worth of nice.
Monday, August 21st, 2006 01:29 am (UTC)
That's why you get one that's come off a 3 or 4 year lease. It'll be in perfect condition and cost only about $28k!

I am a vile tempter, sometimes.
Monday, August 21st, 2006 01:48 am (UTC)
And it'll have 60k miles on it, warranties all expired, and it'll require premium gas. :)

Still...
Monday, August 21st, 2006 04:39 am (UTC)
no, that's just it, it won't... With a lease, the miles are super-constrained, as it costs $$ if you go past the yearly milage limit, and they usually have extended warranties (the original warranty is 5 years anyway). also, according to the lease contract, they have had all their suggested tune-ups *at the dealership* so they're all covered as well.

This is markedly different from a used non-lease car.... avoid those ;-)

Of course, I am not trying to get you to buy a convertible BMW, but as someone who drives one on occasion (Bill owns one), it's not too bad ;-) Yes, you have to buy premium petrol, but that's *maybe* an extra $2.00 at each fill-up, at least around here.
Monday, August 21st, 2006 06:35 pm (UTC)
Aren't lease limits something like 15kmi / yr? I know very little about leases, never having looked into it.
Monday, August 21st, 2006 09:04 pm (UTC)
No, they're much less than that, often between 7-10k/yr. In the industry, it's considered "normal" to drive about 10k miles/year. With leases, I'd rather have the asset. It's like renting a house. Don't bother, if you can afford to buy. After 3 years of leasing, you've given the car company most of the cost of the car, and you don't have anything to show for it.
Monday, August 21st, 2006 10:28 pm (UTC)
Oh wow. That is surprising to me. I drive 8K/yr at most, and most friends who look at their own odometers and do a little quick math consider me pretty odd for that.

I'd rather have the asset.

Ayep - that's why I never looked into leasing. If I leased in 1989 I'd have been driving my fifth car instead of my first!