Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 02:33 pm
Every so often I notice that a snippet I wrote did not get its point across. Sometimes it's a piece I thought I wrote clearly, and other times it's something I wrote in haste. About half the times, I look at my words and the responses and I simply cannot figure out how the point got missed.

I do believe communication takes two (or more) interested parties, but I also strongly believe that if it's *me* who wants to get an idea across, the majority of the burden is on *me* to make that happen.

I was musing about all this this morning, and I came up with the idea of "writing comprehensibility training". That's what I need, right? Making my writing more clear would help, right? Maybe there's a course, I thought.

So I envisioned a school where I would be asked to write many separate pieces per week, ranging in length from a few lines to a well-thought-out multipage essay. The benefit of this course would be the readers. For most if not all of the things I wrote I'd get feedback from multiple readers as to what THEY thought the piece was about. As readers' feedback mentioned more and more the point(s) I had set out to make, I'd know my writing was becoming clearer and less likely to be misunderstood.

Then I thought: CJ, you have an account on LiveJournal.
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 02:53 pm (UTC)
Then I thought: CJ, you have an account on LiveJournal.

Indeed!

Although, you might want to prompt people so they know you want replies of whatever type, because otherwise people pick _weird_ things to reply to. ;)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 03:01 pm (UTC)
Well, true. Maybe that makes it more fun, though. People can reply to whatever they feel like replying to!

I'm waiting for the *complete* non-sequiturs to come rolling in in response to this journal entry. I have a handful of friends who have just the right personality to respond "Try changing your samba password" or "Next time, bake the crust first". :-)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 03:05 pm (UTC)
Damn, well if you're expecting us to mis-interpret this post, then there's really no fun in doing so, is there?!
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 03:06 pm (UTC)
Oh rats, I spoiled it, huh? But, but, it's still fun to see the clever things people come up with! :-)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 06:06 pm (UTC)
But you just changed your samba passwd. Wait, I think I missed the point...
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 06:25 pm (UTC)
But the crust is still a little doughy.
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 03:58 pm (UTC)
I do believe communication takes two (or more) interested parties, but I also strongly believe that if it's *me* who wants to get an idea across, the majority of the burden is on *me* to make that happen.

When you're done with it, can I have the brain back? ;-)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 04:34 pm (UTC)
Why, do you need to use tongs? ;-)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 07:26 pm (UTC)
His area is moist. ;)

By the way: duh. I look forward to seeing what you shall inflict upon us.
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 11:20 pm (UTC)
But, but, I don't have anything in mind. Just stuff. Y'know, like I always post. Stuff.

Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 04:44 pm (UTC)
Are we allowed to suggest topics?

;-)

Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 05:46 pm (UTC)
Sure! I reserve the right to add a bit of whimsy. Spices things up, it does. (Too much leads to heartburn.)

Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 06:33 pm (UTC)
heartburn? we wouldn't want that.

Oh I got it, this post is about heartburn, right? Maybe you should see a cardiologist, I got a funny diagnosis when consulting one...
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 06:51 pm (UTC)
:-)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 08:23 pm (UTC)
I know! I know!
This post was about using your LJ as a way to improve your writing clarity.

What do I win? :)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 11:26 pm (UTC)
You win the Silver Tiara of Unparalleled Comprehension! Two or three more of those and you can trade up for smittens. :-)

(I just asked Rob: How many l's does "parallel" have? He replied: "Three. Unless you're in Japan, in which case it's four, because the r is an l."

This is much funnier if you've just spent the last hour listening to Japanese square dance callers, trust me!)
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 10:08 pm (UTC)
We shall not cease from posting
And the end of all our posting
Will be to encounter what we posted
And read it again for the first time
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 11:27 pm (UTC)
...And comprehend it for the first time. :-)

OK, now I'm worried. I'm wordy enough!
Wednesday, December 1st, 2004 11:29 pm (UTC)
yeah, that works better :)
Thursday, December 2nd, 2004 08:31 am (UTC)
*snork*
Saturday, December 4th, 2004 06:36 pm (UTC)
Beebalus Bobbalus
CJ the blog writer
wanted to see if her
friends got the drift;

testing her blog entry's
fathomability,
Found that non sequiturs
Gave her a lift.
Sunday, December 5th, 2004 10:07 am (UTC)
Excellent! Gold stars for the double dactyl!