February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, April 2nd, 2003 09:33 pm
I've heard mention of a study indicating that it is more distracting to drive with an infant in a car seat than it is to drive using a cell phone. Anyone know more? Please point me to the study.

(I'd love to see one on talking to other people inside the car, too. Actual data, not conjecture or anecdote.)
Thursday, April 3rd, 2003 06:38 am (UTC)
I've heard another study referenced on NPR (I don't remember the details of the study) that said that car phone hazards were greater than child-in-car, eating-or-drinking-while-driving, and pet-in-car hazards combined. (DUI outweighed carphone use, though.)
Thursday, April 3rd, 2003 09:41 am (UTC)
I've seen one believing car phone use was comparable to DUI. Sounds like no one knows for sure, and people are just picking something to hate.

Personally, I hope if we ban cellphones-used-with-headsets, we also ban in-car conversation of any kind, and the ability of the driver to reach for something on the floor or on another seat or on the face of the radio. Fair's fair. But I doubt we'll do that.
Thursday, April 3rd, 2003 10:29 am (UTC)
i think practice comes into play. i have a manual shift car and a tiny cell phone. after nearly rear-ending a cop trying to answer my phone in town, i made the rule that i NEVER use my cell while driving: not enough hands. i've mastered eating in the car, as i do that frequently. screaming babies/children in the car? i can see the wreck in my head. Negotiating a treacherous stretch of downtown highway at high speed in pre-rush-hour while removing a chewed-up tape from the tape deck w/o completely destroying it? i could do that in my sleep. ;-)

good ol'fashioned Common Sense is required, too. i think there should be a Common Sense portion of the drivers' test, and if you can't pass that, you don't get to drive.
Thursday, April 3rd, 2003 10:58 am (UTC)
Yeah. I once changed clothes while driving down a highway; I believe I'm safer on a cellphone than most drivers around me seem to be when alone and not on a cellphone; fifteen years or more ago I mastered eating a McDonald's Big Breakfast (with fork and knife!) in a stick shift; but if I have a baby or a beer, or need to find my map book under the seat, FORGET IT.

I think there should also be an Attention Span portion and an Awareness Of What's Going On Around You portion. I was just telling [livejournal.com profile] joedecker the other day that one of the reasons I feel comfortable riding in a car he is driving is that his actions make it clear he knows where all the other cars are. He keeps that in his head and acts accordingly. He chooses different paths than I would choose, but he doesn't do anything wildly inconsistent with other cars' position and speed. At a subconscious level, I keep that mental map even as a passenger, and when the driver acts in disagreement with what I know is out there, I get nervy. Very few drivers pass the CJ-comfort Awareness Test.

Then again, very few humans are aware of what's around them. I still remember the woman who ran over a CAUTION sign with her stroller. Not just didn't see it, not just ignored its warning, but ran over it. I bet she has a driver's license. I bet she'd look down her nose at me if I used a phone. If SHE can't drive safely while on the phone, obviously no one can, right?
(Anonymous)
Thursday, April 3rd, 2003 10:45 am (UTC)
The "phone call equivalent to two beers" stat comes from a study done by mercedes, if I remember correctly; they also concluded that it was the mental-space distraction, not the poor ergonomics, because it happened with integrated-handsfree too. Unfortunately, a couple of minutes of googling only finds jokes and rants, but not the study; I haven't tried looking under news.google specifically yet. _Mark_