February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, July 9th, 2002 11:03 am
My X chromosome is acting up again. I'm hunched in a nearly-foetal position, perched on the edge of my chair here at work, waiting for the painkillers to kick in.

Yet again the amazement rolls over me: medical science has so far done nothing about this problem. They don't fully understand its cause, they don't have a cure, they can't even usually mask the symptoms (ok I admit I haven't tried narcotics). If men as a group had anywhere near this much trouble from one syndrome, it would be Medical Enemy Number One. There'd be bazillion dollar grants to try to cure it. Until a cure was found, a man desiring corrective surgery to remove the whole offending area would be supported and empathized with and probably have the whole thing paid for by insurance. (Viagra is covered by many medical plans! That's about as medically necessary as a toupee! That's the type of service GUYS get, while I pay all my OTC painkiller costs AND my birth control pills out of pocket.)

Why are women so hated?
Tuesday, July 9th, 2002 04:32 pm (UTC)
I'm in a feisty mood, so let's put another spin on the Viagra/BCP thing: suffering. How much does the man suffer if he doesn't get Viagra? How much does the woman suffer if she doesn't get the Pill? I contend they're not only comparable, but the woman's got it worse.

I guess the whole argument pivots around what health care is for. Is it about making our bodies work the way "Nature intended"? (In which case, dump Viagra. Nature's fine with some people, especially older people, not breeding.) Is it about making our bodies work the way we WISH they worked? (In which case, cover BCPs and Viagra.) Is it about making our bodies work the way some standard youthful body works? (In which case, cover Viagra, as well as facelifts and arguably sex changes.) Is it about reducing pain? What exactly is it about?