February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, June 12th, 2007 06:18 pm
Who came up with the idea of selling button-down shirts to women? If men's pants were designed with such idiocy, guys would flash their junk every time they took a step.

I know better and I still bought one.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 01:21 am (UTC)
Someone who either didn't have much up there or wanted to see it on women who do, I'd guess.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 01:37 am (UTC)
you can dream, can't you? *sigh*

here, let me grab my tape measure, my pincushion, and some paper and a pencil ... surely we can attack this thing and make it work for your body, right??? i know nothing about alterations, but i sure can't do any worse than what the clothing industry churns out!

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:14 am (UTC)
Who came up with the idea of selling button-down shirts to women? If men's pants were designed with such idiocy, guys would flash their junk every time they took a step.

From your statement I can probably venture a good guess, not only to the question of "who?" but also "why?"

And I actually own a couple of pairs of shorts that seem to be designed with "such idiocy"...
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:29 am (UTC)
The same idiot who designed boxer shorts, I suppose.

And yes ... in most boxer shorts, guys flash their junk every time they take a step.

This is why I wear knit boxers (also called "boxer briefs"); they don't flash my junk when I walk around.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:35 am (UTC)
OK, wait... I think you lost me. This would be a bad thing, you're saying?
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:40 am (UTC)
I just wear my boxers at home. Jen enjoys it.

I'm certain I can model for polite requests...
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:49 am (UTC)
How about for impolite requests?
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 03:12 am (UTC)
And worse are fitted button down shirts!
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 03:30 am (UTC)
I'm confused, too. A button down shirt to me is when the collar tabs have buttons on them. I can't imagine a woman wearing a shirt like that, mostly in that they're built for a man.

Is that some modern fashion for women-in-the-office that I've never heard of?

(scratching head)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 03:40 am (UTC)
Some clothes are for modesty. Some are for plausible deniability.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 04:56 am (UTC)
Well, yeah; un-fitted ones I can't even get into. Fitted ones would probably be okay if they, well, fit. :-)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 04:58 am (UTC)
I meant a shirt made of woven non-stretch fabric in which the front center closure, for the length of the shirt, is buttons.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 04:58 am (UTC)
Bad for ME, yes.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 04:59 am (UTC)
Yeah, we could make it work if we found more of this fabric.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 04:59 am (UTC)
I loved Princess Di in her pink button-down oxford shirts and black pants.

I also love flashers.

I'm a perv. So?

I can't make it on Sunday to the dance, but wear a button-down shirt and flash 'em for me. Thanks!
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 05:00 am (UTC)
...er, wait. I meant I don't want to be the one flashing. I'm perfectly content with what guys choose to flash or not flash, except perhaps I might want it toned down a bit in the office. :-)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 05:01 am (UTC)
Next time I wear a button-down shirt it will be in your honor! :-)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 05:06 am (UTC)
want pix plz
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 01:47 pm (UTC)
Great definition! Have you been having to write good requirements for engineers lately? *g*

Bean and I have taken to calling these "button up shirts" or "collared shirts". They're pretty much all I wear when I go on training gigs, interviews, etc.

And I'm a busty person, too. And I refuse to wear shirts that gap at the buttons (or have pockets over the tits, which is a different issue). If you get a shirt that *actually* fits, it will fit.

(Note that most inexpensive shirts will not fit this definition because they are poorly made.)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:30 pm (UTC)
You say that as if flashing is wrong?
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 02:59 pm (UTC)
I call that a button-*up* shirt - a button-down one is what billeyler said.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 03:54 pm (UTC)
Huh. I button them *down*, not up. :-)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 03:55 pm (UTC)
I care less how well it's made than how well it FITS. Sadly, there are excellent economic incentives against fitting shirts to people shaped like me.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 04:27 pm (UTC)
me too, but i *call* it 'buttoning up my shirt' :)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 07:22 pm (UTC)
Who came up with the idea of selling button-down shirts to women?

Um, men??

Okay, I'm a perv, I admit it. But some of the sexiest things I see are those little flashes from women. So I can't complain.

And, I agree with the other commenter, this post needs pictures. :)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 08:53 pm (UTC)
Good point! How's this: boxers aren't marketed as business attire. :-)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 09:44 pm (UTC)
or have pockets over the tits, which is a different issue

I just always assumed those were meant to be decorative :)
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 09:47 pm (UTC)
A button down shirt to me is when the collar tabs have buttons on them. I can't imagine a woman wearing a shirt like that, mostly in that they're built for a man.

*is confused* They, uh, fit my neck just fine. Last I checked, necks weren't one of the places where male and female bodies differ significantly.
Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 09:51 pm (UTC)
Oh, yah...I understand what the issue is...

Next time I see CJ, I'm hoping she'll wear that particular shirt so we can admire all the gappy parts! ;-)
Thursday, June 14th, 2007 02:25 pm (UTC)
I find that there is no point to boxers.
Friday, June 15th, 2007 11:36 am (UTC)
I keep wanting to make a project of sewing li'l velcro dots (one to three of them) between the near-the-breasts buttons on *all* my button-up shirts. Grrrr! This has been a pet peeve of mine for *AGES*!
Friday, June 15th, 2007 06:02 pm (UTC)
Yes, that'd be an excellent approach. Too bad there are strong economic incentives against making such shirts ACTUALLY FIT women with BOOBAGE. (Not enough potential customers.)

I so want to go get myself shrinkified.