cjsmith: (b&w fancy rob)
cjsmith ([personal profile] cjsmith) wrote2002-02-14 06:06 pm

NOW what?

ALL right folks, who stole my "Comment on this" link from the previous post?

I swear, LJ hates me. No one else has the stupid reply links. Now I can't get comments at all. Grrr.

[Edit: Well, at least THIS one has it. No, I did not disable comments on the previous entry! Not intentionally.]

[Much Later Edit: HAHAHAHAHA, Joe told me how to access that entry for editing. Comments are enabled again! The missing link is back! I have TRIUMPHED! With a little help from my friends. :-)]

[identity profile] wcg.livejournal.com 2002-02-14 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Shall we go on a Search and Rescue mission to find the missing link? I'll take the ground patrol, and you provide air cover. When we find it we can return it to LJ Maintenance and demand a more tractable link that won't run away again.

[identity profile] joedecker.livejournal.com 2002-02-14 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
[Edit: Well, at least THIS one has it. No, I did not disable comments on the previous entry! Not intentionally.]


If you go back and edit that one, can you see if that got accidentally checked?


LJ isn't outputting "comment on this", so it doesn't appear to be the sort of weirdness that sometimes crops up from malformed HTML.

[identity profile] tytso.livejournal.com 2002-02-14 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, for what it's worth, your latest reply to a comment I made in your journal had a fairly short URL in the e-mail notification to me -- only about 70 characters or so. Is this one to you any better?