I made it about half-way through the first sentence, then scanned the next few paragraphs and then gave up.
It looked like it might even be an interesting subject, but I just don't see that it is high enough interest to wade through more of that horrible prose.
I once expressed this sentiment by saying, "Mark Morford is my new hero. May I someday write like you write, but not, you know, like you write. (http://deyo.livejournal.com/8389.html)"
His main thesis -- that EVIL KKKORPORATE AMERIKKKA somehow brainwashes us into accumulating possessions -- is pretty mockable. I'd take up the burden, but it's frankly easier, as a lazy, gluttonous American, to dismiss it with a little moue of disgust. I find that Morford really helps me work on my moue of disgust; my moue muscles can lift 30 pounds now.
We accumulate stuff because we change as people -- we stop using (set of stuff A) and get (set of stuff B) that is more in tune with our new interests. That's not horrible, or morally evil, or wrong; it's just being a damn person. Yes, throw stuff out when you don't use it; that's fine. But ascribing some sort of moral sin-state to clutter is just being a jerk on a titanic scale, which is pretty much bog-standard Morford.
I followed the link, and it's pretty interesting, but (A) you're right about the full-stop problem, and (B) it doesn't really apply to someone who keeps moving over the ocean with a limited shipping allowance, does it, and (C) I don't get all his pop culture references.
Still, I love anything that even hints at Buddhism, and "get rid of your junk, just let it go" has a feel of that, doesn't it?
The idea that I'm doing something dumb because I'm brainwashed, instead of because I'm dumb, is personally abhorrent to me. If I'm dumb, I can learn. So far, for a variety of issues in my life, dumb wins on evidence. I *have* learned. Many things.
I like his point about clutter in general, though, at least the part of it where he's claiming clutter is a burden. It *is*. And I was amused by his description of the staunch minimalist house "lit by $15K of recessed lighting". Hit that one on the head, he did.
But yeah, he's pretty big on ascribing moral sin-states. That gets old. That was old in high school.
I loved the description of the staunch minimalist house -- it made me laugh. I wish I could come up with bits like that. But I could sure leave off the snideness and the sermonizing. If I wanted to be told how shitty everyone was (and me with them) I'd have kept going to church.
I sort of went off Morford about six months ago. I get the newsletter, and if the taste of the article grabs me I'll go read it. But, yeah, I did get tired of the style. And the self-rightousness. My feelings about him are complicated because I really do feel he has some good things to say, and has said them. But I feel like I need a pick and a spade to dig out the gems. It's too much work.
Yeah, communication may be a two-way street but column writing (any writing for a wide audience, really) puts a lot of the burden of effective communication on the sender. If there's too much noise on the channel, the audience drifts away.
Hey, that's exactly how I read it! The subject is one near and dear to my heart (too much crap!), but danged if I could get through one of his sentences without skipping ahead to the end...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I made it about half-way through the first sentence, then scanned the next few paragraphs and then gave up.
It looked like it might even be an interesting subject, but I just don't see that it is high enough interest to wade through more of that horrible prose.
no subject
no subject
no subject
We accumulate stuff because we change as people -- we stop using (set of stuff A) and get (set of stuff B) that is more in tune with our new interests. That's not horrible, or morally evil, or wrong; it's just being a damn person. Yes, throw stuff out when you don't use it; that's fine. But ascribing some sort of moral sin-state to clutter is just being a jerk on a titanic scale, which is pretty much bog-standard Morford.
no subject
no subject
Still, I love anything that even hints at Buddhism, and "get rid of your junk, just let it go" has a feel of that, doesn't it?
no subject
I like his point about clutter in general, though, at least the part of it where he's claiming clutter is a burden. It *is*. And I was amused by his description of the staunch minimalist house "lit by $15K of recessed lighting". Hit that one on the head, he did.
But yeah, he's pretty big on ascribing moral sin-states. That gets old. That was old in high school.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject