Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 08:28 am
Next up in the Hornblower movieverse: The Wrong War (originally The Frogs and the Lobsters), featuring Horatio Hornblower’s involvement in the ill-fated attack French royalist landing at Quiberon. (“Quiberon! There was a D. K. Broster book about that!” I crowed.)

Enjoyable as usual, although the slashiness quotient was low (very little Kennedy, Bush hasn’t appeared yet). Once again the film is telling pretty much the same story as the book but changing the thematic valence: in the book, the point of Quiberon seems to be that the strict discipline of the marines saves the day (for the British retreat, anyway, the undisciplined Royalists are screwed), whereas here, Captain Pellew saves the day by disobeying his orders to stay at one beach and instead heads to the other to pick up the possible survivors.

(Basically I think the Hornblower movies were made by people who are really more sympathetic to the liberte, egalite, fraternite of the French Revolution than the ideals of the Royal Navy circa 1800: obedience, order, discipline, respect for rank, etc. etc.)

Also, the filmmakers decided that it was time for Hornblower to have a romance (with a girl), and have therefore introduced the character of Mariette, a French peasant girl who became a schoolteacher following the Revolution. This led (I imagine) to some version of the following conversation:

FILMMAKER #1: But what will we do with Mariette in the later films?

FILMMAKER #2: Don’t worry about it! We’ll kill her at the end of this one.

I did not care for this ending, so I have taken the liberty of rewriting it, starting from the scene in Mariette’s house where Hornblower begs her to run away with him while the townsfolk outside riot.

HORNBLOWER: I won’t leave without you!

MARIETTE: Climb out ze window!

HORNBLOWER climbs out the window. MARIETTE leans out the window looking after him, but does not move to climb down.

HORNBLOWER: Jump!

MARIETTE: (with tears in her eyes) Nevaire can I leave la belle France! Vive la Republique! Adieu, ‘Ornblowaire!

MARIETTE shuts the shutters. HORNBLOWER looks like he wants to climb back up and argue, but suddenly the yelling is getting much closer, and he must flee.

HORNBLOWER makes it to the bridge literally seconds before the British blow it up. The British retreat to the beach, where they are rescued by the Indefatigable.

HORNBLOWER stands by the rail, staring out at the receding coast of France. KENNEDY comes to stand beside him.

HORNBLOWER: “I could not love her, dear, so well/loved she not la belle France more.”

KENNEDY clasps Hornblower’s shoulder in manly sympathy. They gaze together at their one true mistress, the sea.

FIN
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 07:15 am
It's challenge time!

Comment with Just One Thing you've accomplished in the last 24 hours or so. It doesn't have to be a hard thing, or even a thing that you think is particularly awesome. Just a thing that you did.

Feel free to share more than one thing if you're feeling particularly accomplished!

Extra credit: find someone in the comments and give them props for what they achieved!

Nothing is too big, too small, too strange or too cryptic. And in case you'd rather do this in private, anonymous comments are screened. I will only unscreen if you ask me to.

Go!
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 12:05 pm

Posted by Bruce Schneier

Microsoft gives the FBI the ability to decrypt BitLocker in response to court orders: about twenty times per year.

It’s possible for users to store those keys on a device they own, but Microsoft also recommends BitLocker users store their keys on its servers for convenience. While that means someone can access their data if they forget their password, or if repeated failed attempts to login lock the device, it also makes them vulnerable to law enforcement subpoenas and warrants.

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 10:04 am

Note that this was written on Monday, 2 February, but is being posted on Tuesday the 3rd because posting from just my laptop is tedious and I have no confidencs in Sable's ability to stay up long enough.

Despite it being disaster season, it's been a pretty good week, modulo exhausting travel and (voluntarily) limited sleep, all thanks to Contabile, the main UK filk convention. N and m went last year; this year we all went (m traveling separately because they're living in the UK now). It's been a very good weekend, and not a bad week before that.

As usual, I'm unlikely to write a separate trip report later (one can hope, but...). The trip was definitely an adventure, taking the ferry from Hoek de Holland to Harwich, then two trains and a cab to the con hotel. The premium lounge on the ferry serves surprisingly good food. So does the con hotel, the Wensum Valley Hotel, about a 20 minute cab ride outside Norwich.

My travel planning and prep has definitely declined. The biggest problem was taking a laptop with a grossly inadequate batter -- I should have taken (Framework 12)Lilac, instead of (Thinkpad x230)Sable, which is definitely showing its age, and has a usable batter life measured in minutes. The list of forgotten stuff is under the cut following the entry for Friday.

Notes & links, as usual )

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 08:05 am

Posted by John Scalzi

HOLY FUCKING SHIT I AM IN THE FUCKING EPSTEIN FILESSpecifically, my essay "Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting" is referenced in a 2013 Rachel Sklar article about Muriel Siebert. Why is it in the Epstein files at all? You got me. What a wild fucking discovery. I am literally agog.

John Scalzi (@scalzi.com) 2026-02-03T07:06:50.335Z

To be clear, I did not expect to find myself in the Epstein Files, inasmuch as I have neither ever met nor have ever communicated with Jeffrey Epstein, nor do I hang out with the sort of people who find themselves on the private planes or islands of known sexual traffickers of children — a fact I’m deeply relieved about, if you want the truth of it.

Nevertheless when I learned that the database of the files is searchable, I put “Scalzi” in it to see what would pop up. I expected — and thus was not surprised by — several references to that name, because a banker with that last name handled some of Trump’s accounts at Deutsche Bank several years ago (no relation, as far as I know). But one of the references is indeed to me: Writer Rachel Sklar referenced me in an article she wrote in 2013, which is in the files for some reason, I assume because someone forwarded it to someone else in an email.

And, look: If one must have the appalling fortune to be in the Epstein Files, a one-sentence reference to an essay one wrote, located within another essay, neither about a topic that has anything to do with the exploitation of children, is almost certainly the best-case scenario. But it doesn’t mean I didn’t look at the reference when it popped up and say “oh, fuck” to myself. What a wild, unsettling and unhappy context in which to find one’s self.

So why mention it at all? One, because when people inevitably come across that reference to me in the files and email me about it, I can point them to this as a way to say “Yup, seen it, what a weird fucking thing that is” without having to type it out every single time. Two, I have enough detractors out there that one or more of them will loudly proclaim to their little pals that I am in the Epstein Files, and then slide past the actual context of being referred to tangentially, rather than being an actual participant in atrocities. Pointing this out before they do gives me “first mover” advantage, and the ability to point out what my appearance is actually about. This won’t stop some of them from misrepresenting my appearance, but that’s because they’re sad little weenies. Here’s the actual file I’m in. You can see it for yourself.

Nevertheless, a declaration:

For the absolute avoidance of doubt: Never once ever had anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein or any of his band of heinous child rapists up to and including the current president of the United States. Put them all into prison. Every single one of them. Never let them out.

John Scalzi (@scalzi.com) 2026-02-03T07:06:50.336Z

I trust that will make my position on Epstein and his party pals clear enough.

What a strange and unpleasant time we are living through, nor are we out of it. And once again I have cause to marvel at the weirdness of my own life, that I should show up, even as an aside, as part of one of most horrible political scandals in US history. I would have just as soon sat this one out. But since I can’t, at least I can tell you how I got there.

— JS

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 07:30 pm
Fandom: Heated Rivalry
Characters/Pairing/Other Subject: Shane Hollander/Ilya Rozanov
Content Notes/Warnings: none
Medium: digital art
Artist on DW/LJ: n/a
Artist Website/Gallery: rombutan on Instagram
Why this piece is awesome: A lovely double portrait of Shane and Ilya hugging. The artist has several more artworks in the fandom on their Instagram.
Link: his dose of sunshine on Instagram, and reposted on tumblr here

Monday, February 2nd, 2026 10:18 pm
(For all the questions, or to submit one of your own, the post is here ♥ )

What's your favorite TTRPG setting, and why?

Ha. I love this mostly because I don't have one.

details on what I mean beneath the jump. )
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 12:06 am
Hundreds of new species found in a hidden world beneath the Pacific

As demand for critical metals grows, scientists have taken a rare, close look at life on the deep Pacific seabed where mining may soon begin. Over five years and 160 days at sea, researchers documented nearly 800 species, many previously unknown. Test mining reduced animal abundance and diversity significantly, though the overall impact was smaller than expected. The study offers vital clues for how future mining could reshape one of the planet’s most fragile ecosystems.


Bluntly put, mining would destroy that very delicate ecosystem, and it would not recover. Also the ocean as a whole is struggling to cope with the damage humanity has already caused, and hasn't got the fault tolerance left to cover more.
Monday, February 2nd, 2026 08:15 pm
There's a Biggles February prompt fest, Biggletines, going on over at [community profile] bigglesevents:

https://bigglesevents.dreamwidth.org/18654.html

Feel free to leave prompts, answer prompts, or both!
Monday, February 2nd, 2026 11:06 pm
With today's posts, all sponsored poems from the 2025 Holiday Poetry Sale have been posted.  You can now check the sale page for title links to see if you missed any earlier.
Monday, February 2nd, 2026 10:43 pm
This poem came out of the January 7, 2025 Poetry Fishbowl. It was inspired by a prompt from [personal profile] helgatwb. It also fills the "Plunging Hoofs" square in my 1-1-25 card for the Public Domain Day Bingo fest. This poem has been sponsored by a pool with [personal profile] fuzzyred.


"To the Beat of Plunging Hooves"
-- an indriso


History is often late
To record what's done or said
By the needful, not the great.

Soleated, harnessed, led
Horses drive the wheels of fate
From behind or by the head.

History, like mountains, moves

To the beat of plunging hooves.

Monday, February 2nd, 2026 08:50 pm

Posted by jwz

There have been exactly two innovations in web browsers in the last 16 years:

  1. "Show Reader Automatically" in 2010;
  2. "Hide Distracting Items" in 2024.

Everything else has either been a waste of goddamned time, or actively malicious. Mostly the latter.

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Monday, February 2nd, 2026 02:31 pm

This is a brief but informative article at Nature Reviews Drug Discovery from folks at Boston Consulting Group looking at the 2025 drug approvals at the FDA. There were 54 such (excluding diagnostic imaging agents), which is consistent with the landscape since 2014 (the average since then has been exactly that!) 2005-2013 average, by contrast, was 30 new drug approvals. In fact, in that post 2014-period, there’s only been one year (2016, with 28 approvals) that wasn’t higher than any year in the 2005-2013 era. We are clearly approving a lot more drugs in this era.

But are we making more money from them? Total peak sales (inflation-adjusted) are indeed higher in the post 2014-era, as they certainly should be. But it’s quite possible that we’re looking at third year in a row of declining peak sales, which has not happened over the last 20 years at all. 

2022 peaks sales are listed as 114 billion, and 2023 as 94. Then 2024 is 81 billion (which is an upwards revision from the initial estimate of about 60 billion), and 2025 is estimated at 62 billion. Now that one will likely be revised upwards over the next year or two - that’s typically what happens, because we’re (a) not all that great at forecasting sales and (b) motivated not to overestimate them beforehand, preferring to surprise people with better-than-expected figures. But we’ll have to see if 2025 manages to not be that third year of decline.

Where is this trend coming from? Almost certainly due to a relative shortage of great big huge blockbuster drugs. As the article notes, only 4 of the approved drugs from 2025 are forecast to hit peak sales of over three billion per year. It’s not that the industry hasn’t had some underperforming years in the modern era (like 2108, with 62 approvals and $59 billion in peak sales, or 2020, with 56 approvals and $49 billion peak sales). But 2022, by contrast, had a relatively low 43 approvals but hit $114 billion in peak sales, and no one’s sure when and if we’ll get back to a figure like that.

I’d say that some of this is likely due to the more “orphan-y” small disease focus of drug development at many smaller companies. And you can’t ignore the more-targeted nature of modern drugs, particularly in oncology. This trend has been coming on for a long time, and as our knowledge increases of the different drivers behind what appear to be similar disease in a patient population, we’re likely to see even more of it. Oncology indeed was the most-represented drug category in this year’s list (16 of the 54, but it has to be said that the estimates for those drugs’ share of peak sales does hold its own (30% of the approvals, 36% of estimated peak sales).

We’ll revisit these figures in another year or two and see how they hold up. It will be interesting - likely not cheering, but definitely interesting - to see how four years of the current FDA leadership will affect these numbers as well. . .

Monday, February 2nd, 2026 08:42 pm
Dinner plans shifted about halfway through cooking: I'd planned to make boxed macaroni and cheese with some vegetables added in, but the vegetables ended up smelling so good, I ditched the cheese. Sauteed onions, garlic, and herbs with rapini and canned tomatoes might've taken well to the cheese sauce, but I'm pleased at how it came out just the same.

My new plan is to make boxed macaroni and cheese with double the cheese sauce at some point in the future, and feel absurdly luxurious for being able to do so.