Omelas

[cjsmith]

I was recently reminded again (thank you, minoanmiss!) of the story The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas.

I love that story.

It's not a comfortable story, not exactly a delight to read*, but it speaks powerfully. LeGuin was a clear thinker and very philosophical. (I own a book of her essays, written later in life, and I have that illusion that readers get, that I know her a little bit through her writings. She's on the short list of people I really wish I could have had dinner with in my lifetime.)

Anyway, the reminder made me think of how strongly that story has affected how I think about people.

Omelas poses a question that, to me, has become one of the things I sort of form guesses about as I get to know people. Would this person ever walk away from Omelas? I don't always have an answer, but if I get to know the person for a while, I form a guess.

I know, love, and trust some people who wouldn't. I treasure those who I think would, and I trust them in a much deeper way.

________________________________________
* see also the difference between enjoying a book and being glad you read it

Comments

[cjsmith]

I will admit to a desire to share the opportunity, as well, especially (and quite strongly!) when I think it might make a difference in how someone thinks or acts in the future. Some savageries do not prosper when brought to visibility.

I so adored that cartoon! Now I really wish I could find it again! I shall keep an eye out for it.

Thank you for the recommendation for "The Good Place". I will check it out! ...This is a very unusual thing for me to say. I don't watch much watchable stuff; I got tired of the misogyny and other asshattery* in what passes for entertainment in like 1979 and will only venture back by special recommendation since. A recommendation from a person who thinks about ethics is worth checking out.

I suspect I agree with you about (simplified) Socrates. The people who do better, in my experience, are indeed people who consider; but the people who are happy are overwhelmingly the people who do not consider, who go out of their way to not consider, and who do better if and only if they are faced with peer pressure. Knowledge isn't enough for doing better, because doing better comes at a personal cost and most don't feel like it. Honesty is an enormous investment, overwhelming for some (most), and... yes. Horror. Ongoing.

* unexamined, tacitly accepted and condoned, and thereby promulgated

[amaebi]

About The Good Place:
When I heard Kristin Bell explaining the premise in an interview near the show's beginning, it sounded hateful to me. I didn't watch until just before the last season, and I would suggest not giving up in disgust (if you were inclined that way) until you've reached the turnaround clarification near the end of the first season.

About ignorance and bliss:
I've often heard people say that people who don't/won't know are happier than those who know about the violences and weaknesses of the world, its people, and themselves. Maybe that's true-- I don't think it's simple to know the state of another's happiness. But for what it's worth, people who choose to remain unknowing or uncaring seem to put a good deal of work into maintaining that state, and it doesn't seem to agree with their tempers. Many-- not all-- of them tend to strike me as touchy and anxious. And they all seem to limit what they make contact with very sharply. Now, some seem to do the limitation on a pretext of purity or quality, and they don't seem so directly distressed. But they don't strike me as happy, either. More as smug or disdainful, not states I associate with joy....

[cjsmith]

Re The Good Place: good to know, thanks!

I see multiple patterns of unknowing. One does seem to match what you're describing. Another simply refutes any reports of a problem by discrediting the reporter: that person is just trying to find something to whine about, this person over here really ought to go to therapy, if it were that bad someone would have done something, it's all in your head dear, and my personal favorite, "you're making yourself sad by thinking about that". Those folks don't seem touchy or anxious.

Ah well. Humans. I shall never understand humans. I can only try to understand myself a tiny bit better.

[amaebi]

I definitely hear lots of bland turnings-away. I'm probably more persistent in reply, though, because conversation almost immediately gets irritable and defensive on their side, from there.... And in general they're pretty cranky when not ceded conversational control.

Yeah. Humans.

I should say, though, maybe we know very different sets of people.

[cjsmith]

Ah, yes, when I'm persistent I sometimes get a cranky response. It must be terrible, the cognitive dissonance when someone who looks like me doesn't immediately admit I must be mistaken.

[amaebi]

People get irritated with me really frequently and fast, I suppose because it's so self-evidently important that I be subjugated.